On Having a Boy
So I've been meaning to write this up for a long while, and I've finally got dribs and drabs of time here and there to do it. Actually, I'm glad it's taken me this long, because my ongoing thinking about this has expanded and really kind of illuminated a lot of things for me, and it's been an interesting journey. It might, in fact, have gotten so long that nobody will read it. But hey, if you can't indulge in tl;dr navel-gazing on your own blog, where can you? I'm still not sure I explain any of this well or even coherently, but I'll give it a go.
As many of you know, I have a son.
As many of you also probably know, I wanted a daughter.
I'm not upset, of course, with what life has dealt me. Have you seen my kid?! He's awesome! But having a boy has definitely led me to some soul-searching about my feelings on gender. Why did I want a girl so badly? What did I think would be different?
I've read a bunch of books on having boys, like Real Boys: Rescuing Our Sons From the Myths of Boyhood (which has multiple flaws I don't want to get into here) and It's A Boy!: Women Writers on Raising Sons. None of them have really connected with me where I live on this issue. I didn't want to have a girl so I could dress her up in cute clothes or have heart-to-heart girl talks or paint our nails together. I wasn't afraid to have a boy because "boys are different" or "boys are hard." But I had a distinct gender preference nonetheless, and when I found out I was having a boy, I started processing my bullshit around it. And I'm not sure I've stopped yet.
Before I get into my "reasons" for wanting a girl, I should tell you, I had a hard time for a few weeks when I found I was having a boy. I am a bit of a control freak, and so the whole pregnancy-and-impending-motherhood thing was hard enough for me. (I, of course, exacerbated it by reading a lot of feminist books about the short shrift mothers receive on America. Because my neuroses need regular watering to be all they can be, evidently.) My whole life was about to change! I was going to have to give up a lot of things! ...and I was going to have to give them up for a boy. I have Big Issues about changing my life for other people anyway, and especially about changing it to suit men. And with the between-the-legs blur on the ultrasound, all of those kicked in, on top of all my anxiety about impending motherhood. Suddenly, instead of a fetus, I felt like I was carrying The Man around in my womb.
Once I recognized this, I was able to laugh it off. Ridiculous, right? I'd make the same changes in my life no matter what the sex of my baby. But this should be some indicator of the kind of gender-related mines that salt my psyche. My feminism has mellowed since I went through the requisite lesbian-separatist phase in my undergrad years, but it hasn't waned. If anything, it's gotten stronger and more central to the way I see the world, particularly since I've become a mother. I recognize that not everyone sees the world through a gendered lens, but I can't help but feel, deep down, that I am right and other people are blind. ...yeah, I know. But al least I own up to it, okay?
So, why did I want a girl?
Reason one: My family.
I grew up very close to my mother's family, and my mother's family has an amazing matriarchal line. I knew my great-grandmother well, and am very close to my grandmother. Of my myriad aunts and cousins, only those in the direct female line of descent are strong, smart, educated, and successful. Indirect female line of descent (that is, the daughters of my uncles or great-uncles) is a mixed bag, and the men, well. Most of them have their good points. Some of them have more good points than others. But nobody would call any of them strong, smart, educated, and successful. Not a single one. And this is a big family; my great grandmother had eight children, and her children had two to five apiece, and their children...well. Maybe there's an exception in there somewhere; I haven't met all of my second cousins once removed, or probably even all of my second cousins. Still, I stand by my generalization. The daughters of my mother's mother's mother's house are exceptional.
I'm proud to come from a line of such amazing women. I carry on a lot of their traditional crafts (quilting, sewing, knitting, crocheting, baking) and I keep them all close to my heart. Having a girl would have been another for the direct matrilineage. And while some boy, someday, has got to buck the family trend, the precedents are not encouraging. Small sample statistics is one of my favorite self-entertainment games, but it's also something that I, like most irrational humans, buy into when it gets too close to my own anecdotal experience. I felt like a girl would have had the genetic deck stacked in her favor, at least on my side of the family. And a boy would have it stacked against.
Reason two: Male privilege.
Well, okay. That's more about why I didn't want a boy than about why I wanted a girl. But it's still a valid concern. It seems strange, perhaps, to want to have your child born on the wrong side of a social power division. Adversity may build character, but what parent wouldn't spare their child as much adversity as they could, given the choice? Well, me, I guess. But still, it's not like gender is the only (or even the primary) power correlate in our society, and I'm not offering to raise the Squid in privation rather than material comfort just because America has serious class issues (though don't think I haven't had dark thoughts along those lines). It's just, any kind of privilege a child has is like the world slipping it sweets on the sly while you are trying to keep it healthy. I have eaten that kind of metaphorical white candy and upper-class candy my whole life, and it's easy to get complacent on a diet of the stuff, to take it for granted, to decide that the world gives you treats because you deserve them, or to forget that it doesn't treat everyone with equal benevolence. I want my children to have empathy, and being on the "wrong" end of one or more power differentials can help foster that. Then again, the Squid is brown, and so one kind of privilege taketh even as the other giveth away, or something. Still, I know so very, very few men who actually think at all about the full extent and ramifications of their male privilege that gender is a very personal dividing line for me.
Reason three: An ingrained patriarchal value system.
I was trying to explain my issues to someone on my erstwhile mother's board and I said something like: I would like to have a child who grows up to be (not necessarily in this or any other order):
Of course, the more I think about this, the more I realize that two types of bullshit are going on here. One is just pure parental arrogance, that one person could think their opinions and beliefs could hold back such a tide. Not that parents don't have influence, but it's heavily mitigated. I can hope. I can try. But as every feminist whose child has whined for Barbie or pacifist whose kid wanted to dress in camouflage for Hallowe'en can attest, I will be just one voice among many. I still don't handle money well, despite my mother's constant lessons in frugality, nor time, despite her instruction and example in efficiency. Some things will stick. Some will not. I need to cultivate more acceptance around this, perhaps.
The second type of bullshit is one that is so crazy insidious I can't even repudiate it. I mean, given a list of adjectives - strong, nurturing, gentle, stoic, businesslike, tender, caring, self-assured - most people could separate those out into "traditional" gender roles, right? And because we live in a man's world, the adjectives are weighted - women who are strong, stoic, businesslike, and self-assured get ahead in life and win respect, while men who are nurturing, gentle, tender, and caring may not. It's a hierarchy, not just a divide. Sure, you can argue the exceptions, and it's a lot blurrier than it used to be - but the fact remains that I have chosen to value a lot of traditionally masculine traits over a lot of traditionally feminine ones. I am not particularly nurturing, gentle, or tender. I don't want to be. Those are not things I value. I've swallowed the dominant value system whole.
I feel like I'm explaining this poorly, but let me keep trying, from a different angle. Trying to be "more like the boys" is never going to get the girls into the clubhouse. It has to be just as important, just as valued, to get the boys to want to come to the tea party, to raise sensitive guys as well as tough girls. More women in math and science is never going to even the balance until more men start going into education and social work. If we are ever to get to any kind of equality, there has to be a place in the middle for both sides to meet. (There is probably a great deal of feminist theory that says this better than I can. There is probably even a word for it. I don't read feminist theory, never have, so I couldn't tell you. Educate me if you know, yeah?)
In other words, maybe I would have been better at teaching a little girl to do the traditionally non-feminine stuff. But is that really something I should value? A lifetime of ingrained thinking is hard to work against, but I'm trying.
Reason four: Women are awesome.
Seriously, awesome. I've chosen to live and socialize in primarily female communities for most of my adult life. Almost all my housemates in college were women. Most of my workplaces have been predominantly female. Three out of five of the online communities in which I have been heavily involved are over 90% female. Most, though not all, of my close friends are women. I have filled my life up to the brim with amazing women. Of course, this one doesn't hold water either. The way I relate to my friends and co-workers will not be the way I relate to my children, regardless of gender. And it's not like there aren't amazing men out there, I just haven't gravitated toward them in the same way.
in the end, none of my "reasons" really holds up to examination. But when I put them all together unexamined, they sure gave me a strong gender preference. It's taken me almost a year and a half to unpack it this far, and I'm sure there are more layers of bullshit lurking underneath this; auto-archaeology is like that.
Several of you said you'd be interested, so I wrote this up. I'm not sure what it does to put it out there like this, and I have reservations about it. But. *hits post*
As many of you know, I have a son.
As many of you also probably know, I wanted a daughter.
I'm not upset, of course, with what life has dealt me. Have you seen my kid?! He's awesome! But having a boy has definitely led me to some soul-searching about my feelings on gender. Why did I want a girl so badly? What did I think would be different?
I've read a bunch of books on having boys, like Real Boys: Rescuing Our Sons From the Myths of Boyhood (which has multiple flaws I don't want to get into here) and It's A Boy!: Women Writers on Raising Sons. None of them have really connected with me where I live on this issue. I didn't want to have a girl so I could dress her up in cute clothes or have heart-to-heart girl talks or paint our nails together. I wasn't afraid to have a boy because "boys are different" or "boys are hard." But I had a distinct gender preference nonetheless, and when I found out I was having a boy, I started processing my bullshit around it. And I'm not sure I've stopped yet.
Before I get into my "reasons" for wanting a girl, I should tell you, I had a hard time for a few weeks when I found I was having a boy. I am a bit of a control freak, and so the whole pregnancy-and-impending-motherhood thing was hard enough for me. (I, of course, exacerbated it by reading a lot of feminist books about the short shrift mothers receive on America. Because my neuroses need regular watering to be all they can be, evidently.) My whole life was about to change! I was going to have to give up a lot of things! ...and I was going to have to give them up for a boy. I have Big Issues about changing my life for other people anyway, and especially about changing it to suit men. And with the between-the-legs blur on the ultrasound, all of those kicked in, on top of all my anxiety about impending motherhood. Suddenly, instead of a fetus, I felt like I was carrying The Man around in my womb.
Once I recognized this, I was able to laugh it off. Ridiculous, right? I'd make the same changes in my life no matter what the sex of my baby. But this should be some indicator of the kind of gender-related mines that salt my psyche. My feminism has mellowed since I went through the requisite lesbian-separatist phase in my undergrad years, but it hasn't waned. If anything, it's gotten stronger and more central to the way I see the world, particularly since I've become a mother. I recognize that not everyone sees the world through a gendered lens, but I can't help but feel, deep down, that I am right and other people are blind. ...yeah, I know. But al least I own up to it, okay?
So, why did I want a girl?
Reason one: My family.
I grew up very close to my mother's family, and my mother's family has an amazing matriarchal line. I knew my great-grandmother well, and am very close to my grandmother. Of my myriad aunts and cousins, only those in the direct female line of descent are strong, smart, educated, and successful. Indirect female line of descent (that is, the daughters of my uncles or great-uncles) is a mixed bag, and the men, well. Most of them have their good points. Some of them have more good points than others. But nobody would call any of them strong, smart, educated, and successful. Not a single one. And this is a big family; my great grandmother had eight children, and her children had two to five apiece, and their children...well. Maybe there's an exception in there somewhere; I haven't met all of my second cousins once removed, or probably even all of my second cousins. Still, I stand by my generalization. The daughters of my mother's mother's mother's house are exceptional.
I'm proud to come from a line of such amazing women. I carry on a lot of their traditional crafts (quilting, sewing, knitting, crocheting, baking) and I keep them all close to my heart. Having a girl would have been another for the direct matrilineage. And while some boy, someday, has got to buck the family trend, the precedents are not encouraging. Small sample statistics is one of my favorite self-entertainment games, but it's also something that I, like most irrational humans, buy into when it gets too close to my own anecdotal experience. I felt like a girl would have had the genetic deck stacked in her favor, at least on my side of the family. And a boy would have it stacked against.
Reason two: Male privilege.
Well, okay. That's more about why I didn't want a boy than about why I wanted a girl. But it's still a valid concern. It seems strange, perhaps, to want to have your child born on the wrong side of a social power division. Adversity may build character, but what parent wouldn't spare their child as much adversity as they could, given the choice? Well, me, I guess. But still, it's not like gender is the only (or even the primary) power correlate in our society, and I'm not offering to raise the Squid in privation rather than material comfort just because America has serious class issues (though don't think I haven't had dark thoughts along those lines). It's just, any kind of privilege a child has is like the world slipping it sweets on the sly while you are trying to keep it healthy. I have eaten that kind of metaphorical white candy and upper-class candy my whole life, and it's easy to get complacent on a diet of the stuff, to take it for granted, to decide that the world gives you treats because you deserve them, or to forget that it doesn't treat everyone with equal benevolence. I want my children to have empathy, and being on the "wrong" end of one or more power differentials can help foster that. Then again, the Squid is brown, and so one kind of privilege taketh even as the other giveth away, or something. Still, I know so very, very few men who actually think at all about the full extent and ramifications of their male privilege that gender is a very personal dividing line for me.
Reason three: An ingrained patriarchal value system.
I was trying to explain my issues to someone on my erstwhile mother's board and I said something like: I would like to have a child who grows up to be (not necessarily in this or any other order):
- Happy and balanced
- Comfortable and realistic about who they are
- Empathetic and sympathetic to others
- Interested and engaged in learning
- Self-directed and motivated
- Emotionally healthy and expressive
- Able to pursue what they want and need
- Sexually competent/confident
- A good and loyal friend and/or partner
- Socially conscious and responsible
Of course, the more I think about this, the more I realize that two types of bullshit are going on here. One is just pure parental arrogance, that one person could think their opinions and beliefs could hold back such a tide. Not that parents don't have influence, but it's heavily mitigated. I can hope. I can try. But as every feminist whose child has whined for Barbie or pacifist whose kid wanted to dress in camouflage for Hallowe'en can attest, I will be just one voice among many. I still don't handle money well, despite my mother's constant lessons in frugality, nor time, despite her instruction and example in efficiency. Some things will stick. Some will not. I need to cultivate more acceptance around this, perhaps.
The second type of bullshit is one that is so crazy insidious I can't even repudiate it. I mean, given a list of adjectives - strong, nurturing, gentle, stoic, businesslike, tender, caring, self-assured - most people could separate those out into "traditional" gender roles, right? And because we live in a man's world, the adjectives are weighted - women who are strong, stoic, businesslike, and self-assured get ahead in life and win respect, while men who are nurturing, gentle, tender, and caring may not. It's a hierarchy, not just a divide. Sure, you can argue the exceptions, and it's a lot blurrier than it used to be - but the fact remains that I have chosen to value a lot of traditionally masculine traits over a lot of traditionally feminine ones. I am not particularly nurturing, gentle, or tender. I don't want to be. Those are not things I value. I've swallowed the dominant value system whole.
I feel like I'm explaining this poorly, but let me keep trying, from a different angle. Trying to be "more like the boys" is never going to get the girls into the clubhouse. It has to be just as important, just as valued, to get the boys to want to come to the tea party, to raise sensitive guys as well as tough girls. More women in math and science is never going to even the balance until more men start going into education and social work. If we are ever to get to any kind of equality, there has to be a place in the middle for both sides to meet. (There is probably a great deal of feminist theory that says this better than I can. There is probably even a word for it. I don't read feminist theory, never have, so I couldn't tell you. Educate me if you know, yeah?)
In other words, maybe I would have been better at teaching a little girl to do the traditionally non-feminine stuff. But is that really something I should value? A lifetime of ingrained thinking is hard to work against, but I'm trying.
Reason four: Women are awesome.
Seriously, awesome. I've chosen to live and socialize in primarily female communities for most of my adult life. Almost all my housemates in college were women. Most of my workplaces have been predominantly female. Three out of five of the online communities in which I have been heavily involved are over 90% female. Most, though not all, of my close friends are women. I have filled my life up to the brim with amazing women. Of course, this one doesn't hold water either. The way I relate to my friends and co-workers will not be the way I relate to my children, regardless of gender. And it's not like there aren't amazing men out there, I just haven't gravitated toward them in the same way.
in the end, none of my "reasons" really holds up to examination. But when I put them all together unexamined, they sure gave me a strong gender preference. It's taken me almost a year and a half to unpack it this far, and I'm sure there are more layers of bullshit lurking underneath this; auto-archaeology is like that.
Several of you said you'd be interested, so I wrote this up. I'm not sure what it does to put it out there like this, and I have reservations about it. But. *hits post*